fort monroe

ADRS

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

and

NON-PERFORMANCE

ANALYSIS

PURPOSE

To inform DCSED TRADOC of the planning
and program considerations for TASS
support to the Army Division Redesign
Study.

AGENDA

85% DMOSQ STRATEGY
ADRS PHASE II
ASSUMPTIONS
CONCLUSION

NON-PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

85% DMOSQ STRATEGY

A comprehensive strategy to achieve 85%
DMOSQ within a five year span, with detailed
consideration for ADRS, MOS Consolidation,
Multi-Component TASS Structure, Active
Component Requirements, and Modification
of Pre-SMDR Process.

85% DMOSQ STRATEGY

Pre-SMDR Process

• Combined TRAP and RTCC

• Combined ITW and NTCC

DMOSQ Ramp

• Current 72% to FY06 85% DMOSQ

• Increased Requirements for Reclassification Back-log

• Adjusted Requirements for ADRS

• Increased Quota Utilization

• Reduction of Non-Conduct Rate

Multi-Component TASS Organizations

• Military Intelligence (96R, 98G, 97B, 97E)

• Transportation Corp (88M)

• Health Care Specialists (91W)

85% DMOSQ STRATEGY

ARM-G

• Historic data and existing data compared to projected data

• IET Training Seats

• Documented Force Structure

• Retention Rate

Identification of MOS Consolidation
Requirements

• Infantry (11B)

Decreased ADT Requirement for Reclassification
Increased ASI and Transition Requirements (AC
Requirements)

• Multi-Capable Maintainer (CMF 63)

Increased Requirement
2 x ADT POI

• Health Care Specialists (91W)

Increased ADT Requirement

I n r m dcqH Qi i d - rs i r\ rr> ant Dam i i res m ant -

APRS Phase II

Institutional Training Load and Cost

PROJ ECTED
CATEGORIES

FY03

stdnHIcosts

FY04

STDNilCOSTS

FY05

STDNT COSTS

FY06

STDNifcOSTS

FY07

STDNT COSTS

TOTALS

STDNilCOSTS

PHASE 2

1,397

$4,787

2,446

$6,685

3,971

$12,238

1,526

$4,539

2,555

$8,376

11,895

$36,625

PAAR

$1,605

$1,818

$3,970

$1,621

$3,019

$12,033

TRT

$1,877

$3,144

$4,932

$1,632

$2,733

$14,318

TRNM

$1,305

$1,723

$3,336

$1,286

$2,624

$10,274

* Note: Dollars in

ADRS Codes $000

* PHASE I- Identified in ATRRS as Component Code GEX

• PHASE II -Requested Additional Component Code GEY

Increase of $36. 6M FY02-07

* Determined training requirement from most current ARF conversion plan

- New analysis captured changes in unit activation

* Provided by-MOS requirements to DAMO-TRI for costing through ITRM

- Provides more accurate student and school house support requirements

- Same cost factors used for ADRS specific as for all other school requirements

ADRS PHASE II

Top Ten MOS's - Snapshot

MOS Rqmt

54B

1670

11H

1517

95B

1426

88M

851

92A

714

11B

595

13B

566

88H

471

63B

446

92G

401

Aggregate Requirement, based on IET, attrition, and secondary MOS
considerations

ASSUMPTIONS

Inventory Glide Path

Current Inventory 309K

FY07 Inventory (Goal) 273K

Division Restructure, Army Transition, and
Future DoD Reductions will be implemented
across a 3-4 year span

TIE Support (or future TRADOC design)

• Accreditation and Proponent Liaison

• Reduction of "Non-Conducts" through liaison
and staff support

• DL Integration and TATSC implementation from

CONCLUSION

ADRS is one of many significant factors
considered in the projection of student load
and fiscal programming of The Army School
System. Coordination between HQDA, NGB,
USARC, and TRADOC will facilitate a
successful RAMP to 85% DMOSQ to achieve
CSA Guidance.

NON-PERFORMANCE ANALYSI

ANALYSIS TOOLS

Training Analysis on Demand (TAOD)

• Internet Based Quota Managers Tool

• Track Data for Several Fiscal Years (Trends)

• Link SIDPERS, AFAM, and ATRRS Data

• Structured Reports

• Track Soldier Status (* under development)

Changed Dates/Location * Enrollment Cancellations

Completions(Phases) * No-Shows Non-conducts

• Quota Manager Cancels Soldier, and De-obligates Funds

Non-

ATRRS Funding Allocation Model (AFAM)

• Identifies Non-Qualified Individuals (TAPDB /ATRRS cross reference)

• Computes Training Costs

• Compares Training Requirement to Training Selection (by State or UIC)

• Customized Reports

ARNG NON-CONDUCTS

Reason

FY 99

FY00

FY01

Cancelled (No Reason)

11

9

2

Consolidated

74

170

47

Funding

Equipment

10

26

15

Low Fill - Auto

568

401

231

Low Fill - Manual

17

17

13

Instructor

10

6

5

Moved to National Mission

2

10

POI-Invalid

11

16

8

Scheduled class exceeds Tmg Program

2

TRAP Down

173

31

17

Weather

2

1

Total

878

687

340

Total Scheduled

3332

3103

1925

Execution Rate

73.6%

77.9%

82.3%

*

*

Excludes ARNG Specialty courses & CLC. FY 01 is 1 Oct - 1 Jun 01.
* FY01 Aviation Constraints -available/mission capable aircraft

NO-SHOW REASONS

Mission Deployment (6%)

Soldier Fails to Meet Pre-requisites
Soldier Fails APFT (6%)

Height/Weight Standards (2%)

Soldier Fails Phase I of a Multi-Phased Course i
Civilian Employment or College/School Conflict

* Class rescheduled/consolidated

* Late notification

* Soldier failed to plan

Travel Time or Distance for IDT

* Class consolidation moved location to another state
Personal Problem (6%)

Injury/illness (6%)

Status Changed (24%)

ON-CONDUCT REDUCTION

TRAP Refinement

* Identify and resolve constraints prior to execution window.

* Discontinue funding/scheduling classes that typically non-conduct
Enforced scheduling policy

* Prohibit schools from over-scheduling

* Reduce class rescheduling

* Unit ATRRS Operators alerted to changes
Reduce ADT/IDT Class Consolidations

Cross-Component Resourcing to eliminate school house
constraints

Consolidated/Nationalized low density MOSs
Surfacing Issues for Resolution at NTCC